Soapstone has outstanding thermal properties compared with many other rocks and building materials.
Properties of soapstone
Soapstone has outstanding thermal properties compared with many other rocks and building materials. To illustrate the advantages of soapstone as a building material and cladding for fireplaces and stoves, a few key figures from thermodynamics are helpful.
The atoms and molecules of all bodies are in constant motion – they tremble, flutter and vibrate, releasing energy as they do so. Temperature is the measure of the strength of this motion and thus of the energy it generates. The more strongly the particles move, the greater the energy released and the higher the temperature. Only at absolute zero, –273.15 °C, do the particles stop moving.
Specific heat capacity c is the energy required to raise the temperature of 1 kilogram of a building material by 1 kelvin. It is a material constant with the unit J/(kg·K). Its value can depend on temperature; for standard calculations it is usually assumed to be constant. The greater the specific heat capacity of a building material, the more slowly it heats up for the same mass and the same heat output, and the better it buffers temperature peaks. The actual buffering effect also depends on the mass, the thermal conductivity and the accessible surface area of the component. It therefore has a direct influence on comfort and the climate in a room.
This comparison shows that soapstone has a higher specific heat capacity than other natural stones (marble, granite, sandstone), so it heats up more slowly than they do and evens out temperature peaks. The temperature in the heated room changes more slowly, creating a comfortable atmosphere.
| Material | Specific heat capacity in kJ/(kg·K) |
|---|---|
| Steel | 0.4 |
| Gravel | 0.84 |
| Glass wool | 0.84 |
| Sand-lime brick | 0.88 |
| Sand-lime brick | 0.88 |
| Marble, granite, basalt | 0.9 |
| Aluminium | 0.9 |
| Solid brick | 0.92 |
| Brick | 0.92 |
| Asphalt | 0.92 |
| Sandstone | 0.93 |
| Reinforced concrete | 0.96 |
| Soapstone | 0.98 |
| Firebrick | 1 |
| Clay | 1 |
| Hollow concrete block | 1 |
| Air | 1 |
| Lightweight concrete (pumice) | 1.05 |
| EPS insulation | 1.38 |
| Oak | 2.39 |
| Pine | 2.72 |
| Water at 15 °C | 4.19 |
| Cork | 106 |
The table above raises the question of what advantage soapstone has over, for example, concrete and pumice. Both have a similar or even greater specific heat capacity. The answer lies in the ability to store heat per unit of volume. For the same volume and the same change in temperature, soapstone can store more heat. The heat storage coefficient S is the product of the specific heat capacity and the density of the material. Soapstone has a higher density than, for example, standard concrete and pumice, and can therefore absorb more heat for the same volume.
The rule is: the more heat a component can store, the more slowly it responds to heating and cooling, all other conditions being equal. This can dampen temperature fluctuations (“amplitude damping”). Under suitable conditions, this can reduce the energy required for heating or cooling.
| Material | Heat storage coefficient in kJ/(m³·K) |
|---|---|
| Air | 1.29 |
| EPS insulation | 35 |
| Glass wool | 84 |
| Cork | 160 |
| Asphalt | 1196 |
| Sand-lime brick | 1232 |
| Lightweight concrete (pumice) | 1260 |
| Brick | 1288 |
| Gravel | 1344 |
| Hollow concrete block | 1400 |
| Pine | 1496 |
| Sand-lime brick | 1584 |
| Solid brick | 1656 |
| Clay | 1800 |
| Oak | 1912 |
| Firebrick | 2000 |
| Reinforced concrete | 2400 |
| Sandstone | 2418 |
| Aluminium | 2430 |
| Marble, granite, basalt | 2520 |
| Soapstone | 2940 |
| Steel | 3120 |
| Water at 15 °C | 4182 |
Thermal conductivity λ (lambda) indicates the heat flow passing through a layer of material 1 m² in area and 1 m thick at a temperature difference of 1 kelvin. The unit is W/(mK). The smaller λ, the better the insulating capacity of a building material. The higher the thermal conductivity, the faster the material releases heat into the room.
Comparing the different natural stones in particular shows that soapstone lies in the middle. This means that soapstone conducts less heat than, for example, black granite, but more than sandstone. When heated to the same degree, black granite will feel rather hot, sandstone cold and ceramic even colder – but soapstone will feel very pleasantly warm and comfortable.
| Material | Thermal conductivity in W/(m·K) |
|---|---|
| Air | 0.02 |
| Glass wool | 0.04 |
| Cork | 0.06 |
| Lightweight concrete (pumice) | 0.12 |
| Oak | 0.2 |
| Water at 15 °C | 0.55 |
| Sand-lime brick | 0.8 |
| Brick | 1 |
| Ceramic | 1.2 |
| Sandstone | 2.3 |
| Soapstone | 3.3 |
| Marble, granite, basalt | 3.5 |
| Steel | 42 |
| Aluminium | 236 |